Jump to content
By UMPIRE

12:7 - Alexandra Amberson vs. Danger Room

MATCH SCORE
Alexandra Amberson: 4
Danger Room: 9

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Calender Man vs. Rainbow Archer

MATCH SCORE
Calender Man: 6
Rainbow Archer: 4

By UMPIRE

12:7 - The Burger King vs. Flo (Progressive)

MATCH SCORE
The Burger King: 6
Flo (Progressive): 9

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Artemis vs. Odin

MATCH SCORE
Artemis: 5
Odin: 8

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Battle Droids vs. Clonetroopers

MATCH SCORE
Battle Droids: 0
Clonetroopers: 14

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Tallahassee (Zombie Land) vs. The Town of Silent Hill

MATCH SCORE
Tallahassee (Zombie Land): 4
The Town of Silent Hill: 7

By UMPIRE

12:7 - The Overlook Hotel vs. Din Djarin

MATCH SCORE
The Overlook Hotel: 4
Din Djarin: 11

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Pele vs. Cúchulainn

MATCH SCORE
Pele: 5
Cúchulainn: 4

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Android 8 vs. Midnighter

MATCH SCORE
Android 8: 9
Midnighter: 3

By UMPIRE

12:7 - The Flash (Wally West) vs. Superman

MATCH SCORE
The Flash (Wally West): 6
Superman: 7

By UMPIRE

12:7 - The Invid vs. The Romulan Star Empire

MATCH SCORE
The Invid: 7
The Romulan Star Empire: 6

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Lucky the Leprechaun vs. Snap, Crackle, and Pop

MATCH SCORE
Lucky the Leprechaun: 7
Snap, Crackle, and Pop: 5

By UMPIRE

12:7 - The Qu (All Tomorrows) vs. The Cylons

MATCH SCORE
The Qu (All Tomorrows): 4
The Cylons: 8

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Michonne vs. Monster Island

MATCH SCORE
Michonne: 2
Monster Island: 11

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Apollo vs. Quetzalcoatl

MATCH SCORE
Apollo: 9
Quetzalcoatl: 2

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Tony the Tiger vs. Dig 'em Frog

MATCH SCORE
Tony the Tiger: 8
Dig 'em Frog: 3

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Scar (Disney) vs. David Xanatos

MATCH SCORE
Scar (Disney): 5
David Xanatos: 9

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Mario vs. Willy the Hillbilly

MATCH SCORE
Mario: 3
Willy the Hillbilly: 10

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Lara Croft vs. Xenomorph Prime

MATCH SCORE
Lara Croft: 7
Xenomorph Prime: 9

By UMPIRE

12:7 - Ryu vs. Sub-Zero

MATCH SCORE
Ryu: 7
Sub-Zero: 5

Rumble 14527 General Zod vs. Loki


Recommended Posts

Zod. Even though magic can affect Kryptonians, it doesn't exactly guarantee a victory for Loki. The blasts from him scepter could at the most stun Zod, but only for a brief moment. That's all the time Zod needs to come right up to Loki and smash him. Plus his armor could absorb some of the blast.

 

 

And if he doesn't feel like smashing Loki, he could just fry him with his heat vision  :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's both - technology and magic - more so magical than technological. :) And Loki's innate abilities are magical from my understanding - he's a skilled magician. The only thing that might be technological (and technically also magical), is the scepter he utilizes that enhances his powers.

I'm pretty sure they made it clear in Thor that their magic is just very advanced science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thor explicitly states to Jane Foster that Science and Magic are one and the same, indistinguishable. My understanding from that is a blend of both, not purely science and that there is presence of magic.

 

It would explain why Loki's capable of using magic without having seemingly anything on his person, you know, technological, aside throwing daggers, in the early stages of Thor against the Frost Giants (His illusions). Anyways...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thor explicitly states to Jane Foster that Science and Magic are one and the same, indistinguishable. My understanding from that is a blend of both, not purely science and that there is presence of magic.

 

It would explain why Loki's capable of using magic without having seemingly anything on his person, you know, technological, aside throwing daggers, in the early stages of Thor against the Frost Giants (His illusions). Anyways...

 

I get where you're coming from, it's just that I really got the implication that it was all advanced science. As I understand it, Thor's comment was more in line with Clark's Third Law: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

 

It doesn't make that tech hocus-pocus, it just means that it appears that way to those who don't know better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thor explicitly states to Jane Foster that Science and Magic are one and the same, indistinguishable. My understanding from that is a blend of both, not purely science and that there is presence of magic.

 

It would explain why Loki's capable of using magic without having seemingly anything on his person, you know, technological, aside throwing daggers, in the early stages of Thor against the Frost Giants (His illusions). Anyways...

Yeah, which, if put into context with Jane Foster indicating the wormhole as a space-time Einstein warp and the whole "Science sufficiently developed seems like magic" dialogue occurring through the whole movie before she meets Thor, it's plainly obvious that the interpretation is that Asgardian Magic is just highly advanced science, not some kind of blend of science and magic.

 

Right, because every science-based technology is visible. Nanotechnology and genetic engineering must be just fields dreamed up by crackpots.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To comment on magic and science being the same. I think Thor means to say that as an example of course is that his Hammer is able to produce lightning that our Earth can produce, there is no difference in the actual lightning per se, but just what is creating it.

 

Now about his immortality, the "apples' could just very well be an apple that has nutritional value besides just vitamins, it may have an element not known to "humans" and therefore it is just magic to us.

 

Good example is in Lord of the Rings, where Wormtongue is fascinated with Saruman's "fire inducing sand" the gun powder that Saruman uses to power up his bomb to destroy Helm's Deep's walls at it's weakest.

 

Now what I do not get is how a) Thor can say that since in the comics there is magic that is different than science. Example: Doom has science and is shown to have magical abilities. Reed Richards is all science, but fails to understand magic.

 

Mind you that Reed Richards is able to contend with alien races's tech intelligence and still fails at magic. SO to me there is a huge difference and both are two completely different things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now what I do not get is how a) Thor can say that since in the comics there is magic that is different than science. Example: Doom has science and is shown to have magical abilities. Reed Richards is all science, but fails to understand magic.

 

Mind you that Reed Richards is able to contend with alien races's tech intelligence and still fails at magic. SO to me there is a huge difference and both are two completely different things

This is movieverse. I've got the feeling that they went with the advanced science route in order to make the whole thing more palatable to moviegoers as opposed to comic book readers. Just conjecture, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, which, if put into context with Jane Foster indicating the wormhole as a space-time Einstein warp and the whole "Science sufficiently developed seems like magic" dialogue occurring through the whole movie before she meets Thor, it's plainly obvious that the interpretation is that Asgardian Magic is just highly advanced science, not some kind of blend of science and magic.

 

Right, because every science-based technology is visible. Nanotechnology and genetic engineering must be just fields dreamed up by crackpots.

 

I'm aware of that - I'm arguing that it's not only science but that there's a presence of magic.

 

Do you have actual evidence of this or is it hearsay :P Aside that, Loki's also regarded by the Asgardians themselves as a master of magic - does this mean Loki from Thor and The Avengers is technically a scientific genius in respect to the entirety of the science that composes of Asgardian "Magic"? A simple google search and I find that it's more so science but there's some traces of magic, hence a blend - many others think the same and many others have observed the same film as you and I. It looks easy to determine from the surface but get down to it and it's not exactly easy. ;) And it wasn't throughout the entire movie - the only mention of Clarke's law was Thor's elaboration to Jane Foster before the campfire iirc. The Rosen Bridge was mentioned prior to Thor's arrival and that was all there was afterwards. >.>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm aware of that - I'm arguing that it's not only science but that there's a presence of magic.

 

Do you have actual evidence of this or is it hearsay

 

It's all ultimately just hearsay and opinions based on observations and inference, regardless of which camp you're in :P . Google searches and the like don't really change that. So unless Marvel or whoever comes out and confirms it one way or another...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Kevin Feige said himself in a old interview it's highly advanced technology that the Asgardians use. To us it just looks like magic. So yea Loki doesn't use magic really.  I remember it being said he was the master of trickery or something like that. Not magic.  Here is a link to a old interview:

 

http://collider.com/kevin-feige-interview-thor/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judging purely from the Avengers, Loki has no chance in hell (or heaven) or God's green earth to win this. Simply put, he was slow, hesitant, even made a joke of upclose (Hulk). What makes anyone think he will drop Zod, a chief nuisance among the headstrong Kryptonians, at whim? Not happenign in this fight. Zod wins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...