Sylar vs The Avengers
Posted 03 June 2012 - 09:44 PM
The Avengers, from the live action film
They are fighting to the death in New York. Neither side knows anything about the other prior to the fight. The fight will go on for as long as it has to. No back up for anyone.
Posted 03 June 2012 - 10:13 PM
Then again this depends does Sylar have all his powers from just the first Season? Or does he also have powers from other Seasons?
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:53 PM
Posted 03 June 2012 - 11:58 PM
Sylar could defeat Ironman too. However Hulk and Thor are up in the air. Once again it needs to be specific whether Sylar has all his powers from all the seasons or just Season One.
Posted 04 June 2012 - 12:01 AM
There is no way for the Avengers to put him down for more than a few moments(due to the healing from claire). And Sylar is intelligent enough to simply focus on one at a time.
Posted 04 June 2012 - 12:09 AM
Posted 04 June 2012 - 12:35 AM
Did he? When?
In Season One he took Peter's abilities too on top of it.
Posted 04 June 2012 - 12:36 AM
Does he have that? I only watched the first season, so I don't know
due to the healing from claire
Posted 04 June 2012 - 12:58 PM
I can't remember the exact season as its been years since I saw Heroes. I can tell you that Claire's ability allows her to even be able to heal from a nuclear explosion. Which we have seen prove of this twice.
Posted 04 June 2012 - 06:32 PM
Posted 04 June 2012 - 07:20 PM
If people weren't so hang up on the hype, we would have the comic version of the Avengers, and this match would be more even (and thus, more interesting).
Out of morbid curiosity, is there any particular reason, for why you feel the need to, not just be an idiot, but spam your idiocy around the forums, waving it around like a flag for the world to see, or is it just because you simply can't help yourself?
Posted 05 June 2012 - 02:17 AM
Posted 05 June 2012 - 04:40 AM
I don't know, is there a reason you need to wave your arrogance and holier-than-thou attittude every time I say something like that, instead of replying in a polite and civil manner for a change?
I'll refer you to my answer, from the last time you asked that question
Do you always have to point out my mistakes in the same smug, condescending fashion? Would it kill you to be polite for once?
Once you stop acting like an idiot, time and time again, waving your ignorance around like a friggin' flag. Then I'll start being polite.
I'm relatively polite most of the time, but idiocy and ignorance annoys me, especially repeat performances.
If needs be, I'll make a quote gallery to show you, and everyone else, exactly what I'm talking about.
To repeat what I've told a ton of people: "If you don't like being treated like an idiot, then don't act like one. It's really not that difficult."
I have to agree Methos that was a little bit uncalled for. I think he might have been joking around too.
As often as he proves himself to be as ignorant as I'm calling him, no, that was definitely not uncalled for.
The first 10, 20, maybe 50 times, I was relatively nice in pointing out his mistakes. That obviously didn't work. Now, I'm going to bash him over the head with it until it works.
Again: "If you don't like being treated like an idiot, then don't act like one. It's really not that difficult."
As for joking around:
1. Smiley's and various emoticons exist for the purpose of indicating things like that. There was nothing in his post to indicate that he was joking.
2. His post voiced exactly the same opinions and idiocy that a large part of his other posts have shown, thus indicating that he was being serious.
If needs be, the offer of making a quote gallery, to show you(and everyone else) exactly what I'm talking about, is still open
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users