I did. Please explain more.Is English your first language, is it your native tongue? At this point I am kinda hoping not. 'Cause most people fluent in a language can account for deviations in it. In fact they have done studies where people read an entire paragraph of typos and most don't realize it. It's kinda the same way we can read words on personalized license plates. Even though spelling on'em has to be adjusted to fit. Just like we know what Mortal Kombat means even though combat is spelled wrong or how to pronounce Ice-T's name even though it isn't spelled Ice Tea. Hold on please tell me you had trouble with either of those?
What is the true purpose of the CBUB?
#161
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:22 PM
#162
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:25 PM
Is English your first language, is it your native tongue? At this point I am kinda hoping not. 'Cause most people fluent in a language can account for deviations in it. In fact they have done studies where people read an entire paragraph of typos and most don't realize it. It's kinda the same way we can read words on personalized license plates. Even though spelling on'em has to be adjusted to fit. Just like we know what Mortal Kombat means even though combat is spelled wrong or how to pronounce Ice-T's name even though it isn't spelled Ice Tea. Hold on please tell me you had trouble with either of those?
Yes it is my first language. Yes we can account for that on license plates, game titles and rap names, because those are people's attempts to be creative and having cool names and such. Your typos on the other hand, don't have that same excuse and thus, serve no purpose but to showcase your laziness to utilize the numerous tools of correction.
#163
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:45 PM
Yes it is my first language. Yes we can account for that on license plates, game titles and rap names, because those are people's attempts to be creative and having cool names and such. Your typos on the other hand, don't have that same excuse and thus, serve no purpose but to showcase your laziness to utilize the numerous tools of correction.
So you can read improper spelling when its on purpose, but not when its accidental? How does that work?
Also in case you some how misunderstood. My post full of spelling errors was not accidental or lazy it was to demonstrate that reading posts full of spelling errors is not as complicated as you've made it out to be and that if they are readable and can communicate their intent then they have fulfilled the purpose of language.
That's not to say I haven't made other spelling and grammatical errors I am sure I have, but I try not to. Though I can say even more so then spelling in some regards. I find proper grammar restrictive and unneeded. Not to mention boring and less dramatic/poetic/creative. Nor do I think it reflects actually speech.
#164
Posted 05 December 2011 - 06:46 PM
Y ru U unible 2reedund rispond 2 dis pst
Ok...first of all, let's look at Mortal Kombat and Ice-T. When you say them aloud, they sound the same.
2reedund...yeah...not so much.
#165
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:01 PM
Dude, look. he was a wicked man I thought Is just painful to read on so many levels. So is grammer important? Is it important to bring a pen or pencil to school? And spelling, jesus christ, it doesn't take a genius to run something through spell check.So you can read improper spelling when its on purpose, but not when its accidental? How does that work?
Also in case you some how misunderstood. My post full of spelling errors was not accidental or lazy it was to demonstrate that reading posts full of spelling errors is not as complicated as you've made it out to be and that if they are readable and can communicate their intent then they have fulfilled the purpose of language.
That's not to say I haven't made other spelling and grammatical errors I am sure I have, but I try not to. Though I can say even more so then spelling in some regards. I find proper grammar restrictive and unneeded. Not to mention boring and less dramatic/poetic/creative. Nor do I think it reflects actually speech.
#166
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:08 PM
Dude, look. he was a wicked man I thought Is just painful to read on so many levels. So is grammer important? Is it important to bring a pen or pencil to school? And spelling, jesus christ, it doesn't take a genius to run something through spell check.
Did you misspell grammar and forgot to capitalize Jesus Christ on purpose. That's clever of you.
#167
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:24 PM
Says the one who forgets to put a QUESTION mark on the end of a QUESTION. Yes, you are very clever indeed..Did you misspell grammar and forgot to capitalize Jesus Christ on purpose. That's clever of you.
EDIT: Oh and it's FORGET bro.
#168
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:30 PM
The way I've always seen it was that if someone wants to make a match-up without any actual set up, they could use the Rumbles Section. I've done so once or twice but took it a step further and wrote a nice set-up for characters that weren't in the database (Well, one wasn't so, I wasn't going to waste Test Character).
Beyond that, if you're making a match just for the hell of it, kudos... but what about other people looking into said match? What if they want to read something relative to that match? Something made by the creative juices of the person who made said match? Well, they'd be shit out of luck in that aspect. Hence why there's a standard, right? That's how I see it at least.
Match ups are in my opinion, like writing a mini-fan-fiction. And that in of itself could become a part of a whole arc, which could by its end, become a form of fan-fiction itself. Ah, those are fun to read.
Course, if no one bothers to make a set up, well, it spoils the fun for the readers... hence why they get rated bad, no? Yeah, I think that's why there's a rating system, for potential actual writers, and then the Rumbles Section for those lacking the effort to make something decent.
Bleh.
#169
Posted 05 March 2012 - 03:07 PM
#170
Posted 09 March 2012 - 02:20 PM
#171
Posted 10 March 2012 - 11:36 AM
Did it become enlightening before or after it caught on fire?
Before and during, I guess. I just didn't realize there was a contingent which viewed the scenario as an imposition.
#172
Posted 21 April 2012 - 12:24 AM
It seems like there is a place for both and they should probably operate by different rules. I will be adding an option to CBUB match maker which allows for a person to choose which type of match they are doing and send the matches to different forums. A Rumbles type match will not have an FPA rating option but still could be "official" in that it gets on a characters fight history by a method other than rating the Set-Up.
#173
Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:31 AM
BTW, since changes are being made on the CBUB matches' side of things, would it be possible to show characters' secondary images in matches again? It almost seems to be less of a point of adding those extra images to the characters if they don't show anywhere other than in the character's profile.
#174
Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:42 PM
To chime in with my own two cents: The "Purpose" of CBUB has always been a little nebulous (really, the "Purpose" is for the site to act as a nice little resume piece), but the design of it since the inception of player-generated-battles has also always been geared towards encouraging the writing of set-ups; a character can only be in one match at a time, so the ratings system is supposed to reward good writers by allowing them to make matches more often, meaning that they're more likely to be able to use high-demand characters. If the purpose of CBUB was just to say who would win in X vs. Y, there'd be no reason to prevent people from having 100 different "Batman vs. " matches every week.
That isn't to say it isn't possible for someone to get by doing whatever matches they want. I wouldn't be surprised if there have been some people who've been too harsh on fledgling or passive CBUB members. But those members have to also then realize and accept that the site's priorities by design are not really for them. Matches are not listed in order of set-up length, so the people that do want to read interesting set-ups have to look at the same set-up-less matches as people who just go to click on the button for Wolverine, and that's not what CBUB was designed to facilitate.
Or at least, it wasn't. I think having Rumbles-type matches are fine, but I do think if we're going to incorporate them they should be 1) separated from the set-up fights so that people who want to read set-ups don't have to sift through them, and 2) keep them from using up character availability so that if someone wants to write a set-up with Batman in it they don't have to wait for someone who just wanted to slap up another round of Batman vs. Goku or whatever in the Rumbles section to be finished.
#175
Posted 21 April 2012 - 02:49 PM
Note to Fox: We should probably also make it so that Rumbles don't "use up" the character.
Well... Damn it. The coding for Rumbles was so straightforward until this post. Sucks getting new requirements halfway through the development cycle. lol.
#176
Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:14 PM
#177
Posted 21 April 2012 - 04:45 PM
#178
Posted 21 April 2012 - 09:39 PM
#179
Posted 21 April 2012 - 11:58 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











