45 replies to this topic

[Peypeypeypey]

Dear all you rank 3 and above users:
I don't mind if you give me an "It's bad" or an "It's okay", but if you do, please explain to me why you do. It doesn't help to just say "This fight is bad." It does help if you explain what you think would help, or how I could improve. I'm not trying to complain, and if I sound like I am I apologize, but I really don't think it helps anyone if people are just getting on and rating fights bad without any reason.

[LoneWolf]

Dear all you rank 3 and above users:
I don't mind if you give me an "It's bad" or an "It's okay", but if you do, please explain to me why you do. It doesn't help to just say "This fight is bad." It does help if you explain what you think would help, or how I could improve. I'm not trying to complain, and if I sound like I am I apologize, but I really don't think it helps anyone if people are just getting on and rating fights bad without any reason.

Great Idea!

How about if you must leave a mandatory comment for bad rated matches to explain why. Also we will see who is doing most of the negative marks (possible multi-acct etc..). If the comment/bad rating is justified, hey good to go.

In other words, if I want to give someone an "It's bad" I have to provide a reason in comment form. That way you will know 1. Who is giving bad marks. 2. Why.

Ie. "I didn't like it, uncreative and horrible spelling!"

[G4hardcore]

"If only," the woodpecker sighed.

As of late, there's been a string of voters who rate badly on matches. I'm sorry, but there's literally nothing we can do about it. I've tried being nice, and I've tried offering incentive. I've tried reasoning, and nothing short of not posting matches at all will stop these hooligans. These people will keep voting badly, and the worse part is you will never know who they are, because they never leave comments explaining their actions.

What you could do, if you have the motivation, is keep track of those who don't comment. The ones who don't comment but make matches regularly. Said members will have the ability to vote, ie has a rank of three or higher, which should narrow the margin. These members will also have logged on sometime within the week, signifying they are indeed still active members. After that careful process of elimination, you'll find the handful.

[bigballerju]

Only people 3.5 and higher can rate matches so you can start there.

I agree there are 3-5 people rating bad on matches without commenting.

I have a 3.9 and its been done to me as well.

I have tested this theory to do a match and see it is the same number of votes when I
get a bad rating.

I check my matches to see who liked it and commented.

Now if me and people who do vote stop rating we would be bad to do that right? LOL

[Hayesmeister5651]

Yea it has been happening a lot recentyl, I have been sticking to the forums as of late.

[Darksaiyajin345]

Yea it has been happening a lot recentyl, I have been sticking to the forums as of late.

The last two matches I did got bad rankings (Dante v Headless horseman and Chichi vs mr satan) Got a 2.9 and a 3.0 this was pretty upsetting since most of the time I get 3.7 - 4.0 and no one told me why they rated those two matches so I would like people why they give it a Its bad so I can improve sadley they don't.

[The Blue Flame]

I tell people when I give them bads or okay's. Because I wish others would tell me when they did it to me.

[Peypeypeypey]

The last two matches I did got bad rankings (Dante v Headless horseman and Chichi vs mr satan) Got a 2.9 and a 3.0 this was pretty upsetting since most of the time I get 3.7 - 4.0 and no one told me why they rated those two matches so I would like people why they give it a Its bad so I can improve sadley they don't.

My most recent match got a 3.0, which is okay, but I can't see why. It was Samurai Jack vs. Wolverine, and I thought it was pretty good. It had a good debate going and I thought a good set up, but it only got a 3.0. This is strange because my other fight, Aku vs. Diablo, got a 4.0, but I thought the set-up was worse and there was little debate going.

[DamagingRob]

My most recent match got a 3.0, which is okay, but I can't see why. It was Samurai Jack vs. Wolverine, and I thought it was pretty good. It had a good debate going and I thought a good set up, but it only got a 3.0. This is strange because my other fight, Aku vs. Diablo, got a 4.0, but I thought the set-up was worse and there was little debate going.

I've scratched my head over some of the ones of mine that have gotten 4.0s, and then others that had to be bought back which I thought were better than the ones that got perfect scores.

[Darksaiyajin345]

I've scratched my head over some of the ones of mine that have gotten 4.0s, and then others that had to be bought back which I thought were better than the ones that got perfect scores.

The first match I did got a 3.8 and remember that Mirai Trunks vs Vegeta match I did 4.0 it was one paragraph of mindless dribble

[G4hardcore]

The first match I did got a 3.8 and remember that Mirai Trunks vs Vegeta match I did 4.0 it was one paragraph of mindless dribble

Hm.

Quality of writing has gone up, and in turn, quality of members has gone down.

No offense, good-members.

[Darksaiyajin345]

Hm.

Quality of writing has gone up, and in turn, quality of members has gone down.

No offense, good-members.

Im so sorry im bringing the site down ( Couldnt find a sadder face)

[G4hardcore]

Im so sorry im bringing the site down ( Couldnt find a sadder face)

Not you. Unless you think of yourself as a non-contributing member..?

[Peypeypeypey]

Hm.

Quality of writing has gone up, and in turn, quality of members has gone down.

No offense, good-members.

... You're mocking me, aren't you?

[Darksaiyajin345]

Not you. Unless you think of yourself as a non-contributing member..?

No I try to contribute.

[Marvel Man]

We need to rename this "The common sense thread". How can you hate on a match and not give reasons?

Anyways, I need to check into the CBUB more often.

[shellsbut]

it happens here now and again

[badpierce]

Dear all you rank 3 and above users:
I don't mind if you give me an "It's bad" or an "It's okay", but if you do, please explain to me why you do. It doesn't help to just say "This fight is bad." It does help if you explain what you think would help, or how I could improve. I'm not trying to complain, and if I sound like I am I apologize, but I really don't think it helps anyone if people are just getting on and rating fights bad without any reason.

Lol. I get bad ratings all the time. Truthfully, some of my setups are not great. I wish the rating system was wider. Like a scale of 1 to 10. But it is what it is. I don't give out many its bad's and if I do I try to tell them. I also don't vote or rank most of the anima matches because I don't watch any of them and don't like judging a match from a Wikipedia page. What do you guys do when you aren't a fan or don't care about the character involved? Just curious.

[Peypeypeypey]

Lol. I get bad ratings all the time. Truthfully, some of my setups are not great. I wish the rating system was wider. Like a scale of 1 to 10. But it is what it is. I don't give out many its bad's and if I do I try to tell them. I also don't vote or rank most of the anima matches because I don't watch any of them and don't like judging a match from a Wikipedia page. What do you guys do when you aren't a fan or don't care about the character involved? Just curious.

When I'm not a fan of one, I look at the comments to see what other people have to say. If I don't know either, I stay away from the fight most of the time.